Month: November 2018

Chinese photographer Lu Guang has gone missing during a visit to China’s Xinjiang province.

Lu’s wife Xu Xiaoli, who is in the United States, set up a Twitter account this week to spread information about the disappearance of the award-winning photojournalist, who covers sensitive issues in China, such as pollution, poverty, and AIDS.

Xu said Lu had been missing since Nov. 3 after disappearing during a trip to attend several photography events in China.  He was expected to meet a friend in Sichuan on Nov. 5, but failed to appear.  Xu says the wife of Lu’s host in Xinjiang said he had been taken away by national security agents.

A friend of the couple, Chinese artist Wu Yuren, told VOA that Xu considered traveling to China to search for her husband.  Wu said he managed to talk Xu into staying in the United States to publicize his disappearance. 

“We were all very shocked,” Wu told VOA’s Mandarin service.  “Ever since we came to the U.S., it’s rare to hear about someone we know disappeared like this.” 

Wu said Lu may have fallen prey to media suppression in China.  “He thought he had the experience of dealing with this,” Wu said, “But he could not have imagined how bad the situation is now.”

Xu told Radio Free Asia she has been calling officials in Xinjiang in search of word of her husband, but no one has picked up on the phone numbers published online.

Sophie Richardson, China director of Human Rights Watch, told VOA “the Chinese government has a long history of simply taking people whose views it doesn’t like, literally off the grid and disappearing them.” 

She continued, “I think every time this happens, authorities diminish their claim that this country is governed by rule of law.” 

The Associated Press cites Chinese officials as confirming that Lu and a fellow photographer were taken away by Xinjiang state security agents.

Xinjiang has recently been the subject of international concern, after news reports spread word that China has constructed internment camps there to conduct “re-education” of Muslim Uighurs and other ethnic groups.

A representative for Amnesty International, Patrick Poon, told Radio Free Asia that international concern caused by those reports has influenced the Chinese government to try to shut down information coming from the area.

Lu is the winner of a number of photojournalism awards, including the World Press Photo, a National Geographic Photography grant, and China’s highest domestic photography award.  He holds a U.S. “green card” (permission to work in the United States) and in 2005 became the first photographer from China to be invited by the U.S. State Department as a visiting scholar. 

VOA Mandarin service contributed to this report. 
…

your ad here

Chinese photographer Lu Guang has gone missing during a visit to China’s Xinjiang province.

Lu’s wife Xu Xiaoli, who is in the United States, set up a Twitter account this week to spread information about the disappearance of the award-winning photojournalist, who covers sensitive issues in China, such as pollution, poverty, and AIDS.

Xu said Lu had been missing since Nov. 3 after disappearing during a trip to attend several photography events in China.  He was expected to meet a friend in Sichuan on Nov. 5, but failed to appear.  Xu says the wife of Lu’s host in Xinjiang said he had been taken away by national security agents.

A friend of the couple, Chinese artist Wu Yuren, told VOA that Xu considered traveling to China to search for her husband.  Wu said he managed to talk Xu into staying in the United States to publicize his disappearance. 

“We were all very shocked,” Wu told VOA’s Mandarin service.  “Ever since we came to the U.S., it’s rare to hear about someone we know disappeared like this.” 

Wu said Lu may have fallen prey to media suppression in China.  “He thought he had the experience of dealing with this,” Wu said, “But he could not have imagined how bad the situation is now.”

Xu told Radio Free Asia she has been calling officials in Xinjiang in search of word of her husband, but no one has picked up on the phone numbers published online.

Sophie Richardson, China director of Human Rights Watch, told VOA “the Chinese government has a long history of simply taking people whose views it doesn’t like, literally off the grid and disappearing them.” 

She continued, “I think every time this happens, authorities diminish their claim that this country is governed by rule of law.” 

The Associated Press cites Chinese officials as confirming that Lu and a fellow photographer were taken away by Xinjiang state security agents.

Xinjiang has recently been the subject of international concern, after news reports spread word that China has constructed internment camps there to conduct “re-education” of Muslim Uighurs and other ethnic groups.

A representative for Amnesty International, Patrick Poon, told Radio Free Asia that international concern caused by those reports has influenced the Chinese government to try to shut down information coming from the area.

Lu is the winner of a number of photojournalism awards, including the World Press Photo, a National Geographic Photography grant, and China’s highest domestic photography award.  He holds a U.S. “green card” (permission to work in the United States) and in 2005 became the first photographer from China to be invited by the U.S. State Department as a visiting scholar. 

VOA Mandarin service contributed to this report. 
…

your ad here

Faulty equipment and Indonesian carrier Lion Air’s own safety failures had pilots fighting for control of their Boeing 737 MAX 8 as it plunged into the Java Sea on Oct. 28, killing all 189 people aboard, investigators said Wednesday.

Briefing reporters on the aircraft’s black box data, the investigators said they were still struggling to understand why the plane crashed but they cited multiple factors centered on faulty sensors and an automatic safety system that repeatedly forced the plane’s nose down despite the pilots’ efforts to correct the problem.

 

Based on the slew of problems with the aircraft beforehand, they suggested the jet should not have been in service.

 

The National Transportation Safety Commission’s Nurcahyo Utomo said investigators were trying to figure out from interviews with engineers why they certified they deemed the Boeing 737 airworthy.

 

“We need to compare the statements of the engineers with the required procedures,” Utomo said.

 

Once the jet was airborne, the pilots appeared to have been overwhelmed, said another of the crash investigators, Ony Suryo Wibowo.

 

“The problem is if multiple malfunctions occur all at once, which one should be prioritized?” Wibowo said.

 

The lack of the aircraft’s cockpit voice recorder, which is still missing, is a dire obstacle to resolving that mystery, the investigators said.

 

The report by Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Commission repeats earlier recommendations made just after the disaster that pilots be better versed in emergency procedures and aware of past aircraft problems.

 

The investigators recommended that Lion Air ensure it follows proper operating procedures to improve its “safety culture and to enable the pilot to make proper decisions” and that it ensure it keeps proper, full documentation on flights and maintenance issues.

The MAX aircraft that crashed is the latest version of Boeing’s popular 737 jetliner. Its new automated system pushes the nose down if a sensor detects that the nose is pointed so high that the plane could go into an aerodynamic stall.

 

The sensor, called an angle-of-attack vane, or AOA, malfunctioned in earlier flights.

 

Pilots who flew the aircraft from Bali to Jakarta a day before the crash told investigators that the anti-stall system engaged due to erroneous airspeed and altitude indicators, but the flight crew managed to adjust the plane’s pitch manually by shutting the automated system off. That enabled them to restore control and land safely.

 

It was unclear why the pilots on the failed flight from Jakarta to a regional airport the next day were unable to do the same, exactly what technicians did to try to fix the problems and if there were other steps that should have been taken given that four of the crashed aircraft’s six previous flights had experienced technical problems.

 

“We need to find out what happened and why the pilots took different actions. That why we really want to have the cockpit voice recorder,” he said.

 

In a statement following the release of the report, Boeing played up the possibility of pilot error.

 

“As our customers and their passengers continue to fly the 737 MAX to hundreds of destinations around the world every day, they have our assurance that the 737 MAX is as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies,” it said.

 

The aircraft manufacturer noted that the investigators’ report cited actions by the flight crew that led to the crash. It also pointed to maintenance work and procedures that had failed to fix the aircraft’s repeated problems.

 

Peter Lemme, an expert in aviation and satellite communications and a former Boeing engineer who wrote an analysis of the data on his blog, likened the problems to “a deadly game of tag” in which the plane pointed down, the pilots countered by manually aiming the nose higher, only for the sequence to repeat about five seconds later.

 

That happened 26 times during the 11-minute flight, but pilots failed to recognize what was happening and follow the known procedure for countering incorrect activation of the automated safety system, Lemme told The Associated Press.

 

Lemme said he was troubled that there weren’t easy checks to see if sensor information was correct, that the crew of the fatal flight apparently wasn’t warned about the problems on previous flights and that the Lion Air jet wasn’t fully repaired after those flights.

 

“Had they fixed the airplane, we would not have had the accident,” he said. “Every accident is a combination of events, so there is disappointment all around here,” he said.

 

The Indonesian investigation is continuing with help from U.S. regulators and Boeing.

 

More than 200 MAX jets have been delivered to airlines around the world. Pilots at American Airlines and Southwest Airlines complained this month that they had not been given all information about the new automated anti-stall safety system on the MAX.

 

 

 
…

your ad here

Faulty equipment and Indonesian carrier Lion Air’s own safety failures had pilots fighting for control of their Boeing 737 MAX 8 as it plunged into the Java Sea on Oct. 28, killing all 189 people aboard, investigators said Wednesday.

Briefing reporters on the aircraft’s black box data, the investigators said they were still struggling to understand why the plane crashed but they cited multiple factors centered on faulty sensors and an automatic safety system that repeatedly forced the plane’s nose down despite the pilots’ efforts to correct the problem.

 

Based on the slew of problems with the aircraft beforehand, they suggested the jet should not have been in service.

 

The National Transportation Safety Commission’s Nurcahyo Utomo said investigators were trying to figure out from interviews with engineers why they certified they deemed the Boeing 737 airworthy.

 

“We need to compare the statements of the engineers with the required procedures,” Utomo said.

 

Once the jet was airborne, the pilots appeared to have been overwhelmed, said another of the crash investigators, Ony Suryo Wibowo.

 

“The problem is if multiple malfunctions occur all at once, which one should be prioritized?” Wibowo said.

 

The lack of the aircraft’s cockpit voice recorder, which is still missing, is a dire obstacle to resolving that mystery, the investigators said.

 

The report by Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Commission repeats earlier recommendations made just after the disaster that pilots be better versed in emergency procedures and aware of past aircraft problems.

 

The investigators recommended that Lion Air ensure it follows proper operating procedures to improve its “safety culture and to enable the pilot to make proper decisions” and that it ensure it keeps proper, full documentation on flights and maintenance issues.

The MAX aircraft that crashed is the latest version of Boeing’s popular 737 jetliner. Its new automated system pushes the nose down if a sensor detects that the nose is pointed so high that the plane could go into an aerodynamic stall.

 

The sensor, called an angle-of-attack vane, or AOA, malfunctioned in earlier flights.

 

Pilots who flew the aircraft from Bali to Jakarta a day before the crash told investigators that the anti-stall system engaged due to erroneous airspeed and altitude indicators, but the flight crew managed to adjust the plane’s pitch manually by shutting the automated system off. That enabled them to restore control and land safely.

 

It was unclear why the pilots on the failed flight from Jakarta to a regional airport the next day were unable to do the same, exactly what technicians did to try to fix the problems and if there were other steps that should have been taken given that four of the crashed aircraft’s six previous flights had experienced technical problems.

 

“We need to find out what happened and why the pilots took different actions. That why we really want to have the cockpit voice recorder,” he said.

 

In a statement following the release of the report, Boeing played up the possibility of pilot error.

 

“As our customers and their passengers continue to fly the 737 MAX to hundreds of destinations around the world every day, they have our assurance that the 737 MAX is as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies,” it said.

 

The aircraft manufacturer noted that the investigators’ report cited actions by the flight crew that led to the crash. It also pointed to maintenance work and procedures that had failed to fix the aircraft’s repeated problems.

 

Peter Lemme, an expert in aviation and satellite communications and a former Boeing engineer who wrote an analysis of the data on his blog, likened the problems to “a deadly game of tag” in which the plane pointed down, the pilots countered by manually aiming the nose higher, only for the sequence to repeat about five seconds later.

 

That happened 26 times during the 11-minute flight, but pilots failed to recognize what was happening and follow the known procedure for countering incorrect activation of the automated safety system, Lemme told The Associated Press.

 

Lemme said he was troubled that there weren’t easy checks to see if sensor information was correct, that the crew of the fatal flight apparently wasn’t warned about the problems on previous flights and that the Lion Air jet wasn’t fully repaired after those flights.

 

“Had they fixed the airplane, we would not have had the accident,” he said. “Every accident is a combination of events, so there is disappointment all around here,” he said.

 

The Indonesian investigation is continuing with help from U.S. regulators and Boeing.

 

More than 200 MAX jets have been delivered to airlines around the world. Pilots at American Airlines and Southwest Airlines complained this month that they had not been given all information about the new automated anti-stall safety system on the MAX.

 

 

 
…

your ad here

A Chinese researcher has publicly defended his claim he has created the world’s first genetically-edited babies.

He Jiankui addressed a crowd of fellow scientists Wednesday at a biomedical conference in Hong Kong, two days after he posted a video online claiming to have used a gene-editing technology dubbed CRISPR to alter the DNA of twin girls born to an HIV-positive father to prevent them from contracting the virus that causes AIDS.

Dr. He said he conducted his research in secret. His work has not been independently verified, and Dr. He has not submitted his report to any scientific journals where it could be examined by experts. But he told his colleagues that he felt “proud…proudest” of his achievement.

His claims have set off a firestorm of skepticism and criticism. The Southern University of Science and Technology, the university in the southern Chinese city in Shenzhen that employs him, says he has been on unpaid leave since February. The school denounced his research for violating “academic ethics and codes of conduct,” and the Chinese government is urging local authorities to launch an investigation into He’s work.

Shortly after He’s speech before the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, American biologist David Baltimore, a Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine and a leader of the summit, called Dr. He’s work “irresponsible” and a “failure of self-regulation by the scientific community.”

Genetic editing has the potential to remove inherited diseases from the gene pool, but scientists and ethicists worry it could be used to create so-called “designer babies.” They also worry any genetic changes could lead to other genes being altered in unpredictable ways.
…

your ad here

A Chinese researcher has publicly defended his claim he has created the world’s first genetically-edited babies.

He Jiankui addressed a crowd of fellow scientists Wednesday at a biomedical conference in Hong Kong, two days after he posted a video online claiming to have used a gene-editing technology dubbed CRISPR to alter the DNA of twin girls born to an HIV-positive father to prevent them from contracting the virus that causes AIDS.

Dr. He said he conducted his research in secret. His work has not been independently verified, and Dr. He has not submitted his report to any scientific journals where it could be examined by experts. But he told his colleagues that he felt “proud…proudest” of his achievement.

His claims have set off a firestorm of skepticism and criticism. The Southern University of Science and Technology, the university in the southern Chinese city in Shenzhen that employs him, says he has been on unpaid leave since February. The school denounced his research for violating “academic ethics and codes of conduct,” and the Chinese government is urging local authorities to launch an investigation into He’s work.

Shortly after He’s speech before the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, American biologist David Baltimore, a Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine and a leader of the summit, called Dr. He’s work “irresponsible” and a “failure of self-regulation by the scientific community.”

Genetic editing has the potential to remove inherited diseases from the gene pool, but scientists and ethicists worry it could be used to create so-called “designer babies.” They also worry any genetic changes could lead to other genes being altered in unpredictable ways.
…

your ad here