In Documentary, Director Ivory Portrays Beauty of Afghanistan

Paris — The oldest person ever to win an Oscar, renowned director James Ivory, is still making films at 95, with a documentary about his formative trip to Afghanistan in 1960.

Though American, Ivory is best-known for a string of costume dramas about the repressed emotions of Brits, including Remains of the Day and Howard’s End, both starring Anthony Hopkins, and Room with a View with Daniel Day-Lewis.

In 2017, he reached a new generation with his screenplay for Call Me By Your Name starring Timothee Chalamet as a teenager discovering his sexuality, which won Ivory an Oscar at the age of 89.

But his career began as a student making films about art in Venice and South Asia.

“I was making a film in India, and it was getting hotter and hotter,” he told AFP.

“I couldn’t take it another minute. The backers told me to go to a cooler climate, so I went to Afghanistan. I knew nothing about it, but I went.”

Decades later, his footage from Kabul has been worked into a documentary that shows a peaceful Afghanistan, before the wars and extremism that would drag it into decades of violence.

“(The footage) was amazing from the first reel, very poetic and mysterious,” said Giles Gardner, a long-time collaborator who helped pull the film together after digging the footage out of Ivory’s archives.

“With all we know about Afghanistan, the violence we see on the news, this idea of it as a place of beauty has been erased,” he said.

The resulting film, A Cooler Climate, serves as a sort of origin story for Ivory’s career, since it was immediately after returning from Afghanistan that he met producer Ismael Merchant. They became personally and professionally involved and went on to make more than 40 films together until Merchant’s death in 2005.

By then their names — Merchant Ivory — had become a byword for high-quality period dramas.

Their romantic relationship was never revealed during Merchant’s lifetime as he came from a conservative Indian family.

But Ivory said his own life was largely a breeze. Growing up gay in an Oregon town was fine, even idyllic, he insisted.

“I don’t know why people think I had to escape anything, I was a happy young man,” he said.

Still in good shape for 95, traveling between Europe and the U.S. for screenings of the documentary, he comes across as a man of few regrets, apart from the sadness at losing friends, particularly Merchant and their writing partner, novelist Ruth Prawer Jhabvala.

“I wish they were here every day,” he said. “I love them. I’m a very old man now and have close friends, but I miss them very much.”  

your ad here

A Look at What Is Behind Iran, Pakistan’s Airstrikes

ISLAMABAD — This week’s airstrikes between Iran and Pakistan that killed at least 11 people mark a significant escalation in fraught relations between the neighbors.

Long-running, low-level insurgencies on either side of the border have frustrated both countries, and the apparent targets of the strikes — Iran’s on Tuesday and Pakistan’s response on Thursday — were insurgent groups whose goal is an independent Baluchistan for ethnic Baluch areas in Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The question is why Iran and Pakistan would choose to strike insurgents in each other’s territories rather than their own, considering the risk of a wider conflagration.

The background

Iran and Pakistan share a 900-kilometer, largely lawless border where smugglers and militants move freely. Both countries have suspected each other of supporting, or at least behaving leniently toward some of the groups operating on the other side of the border.

Jaish al-Adl, the Sunni separatist group that Iran targeted on Tuesday, is believed to operate out of Pakistan, launching attacks on Iranian security forces. The Baluch Liberation Army, which was formed in 2000 and has launched attacks against Pakistani security forces and Chinese infrastructure projects, is suspected of hiding out in Iran.

Why did Pakistan retaliate?

Pakistan said its strikes in Iran on Thursday were aimed at hideouts of the Baluchistan Liberation Army and the Baluchistan Liberation Front. It also wanted to send a message to Iran and other neighbors that it can fight back if provoked.

The last time Pakistan retaliated against a neighboring country was in 2019, when it downed two Indian warplanes and captured a pilot in the disputed Kashmir region. It followed an Indian strike inside Pakistan against what New Delhi said was a terrorist training camp.

Why now?

Iran and Pakistan have long had a volatile relationship, but these strikes are likely prompted by internal dynamics.

Tehran has been experiencing a growing pressure for some kind of action after a deadly Islamic State group attack earlier this month, Israel’s war on Iran’s ally, Hamas, and wider unrest against its theocracy. Pakistan’s attack on Thursday also served a domestic purpose, according to analysts.

“The government and military have been under immense pressure (since Tuesday),” said Abdullah Khan from the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies think tank in Islamabad. “The public perception of a strong army is not as it used to be, so it had to respond.”

Could the situation escalate?

Iran’s military on Thursday began a planned annual air defense drill stretching from its port of Chabahar near Pakistan in the east, across the country to its border with Iraq in the west. The drill will include live fire from aircraft, drones and air defense systems.

Fresh strikes by Iran and Pakistan cannot be ruled out, although this week’s attacks raise questions about the preparedness of their own militaries, particularly their radar and air defense systems.

For Pakistan, such systems are crucial given its constant, low-level tensions with its nuclear-armed rival, India. Its equipment has long been deployed along that frontier, rather than its border with Iran. Separately, Iran relies on radar and air defense systems in the case of potential strikes by its main enemy, the United States.

What the airstrikes mean for Iran and Pakistan

Launching these strikes allows Tehran to point to it directly taking military action without risking a wider confrontation with either Israel or the U.S., particularly as tensions also remain high over Iran’s rapidly advancing nuclear program.

Pakistan’s strike may relieve domestic political pressure, but could backfire later, as the Baluch Liberation Army said it will avenge the killings and wage war on the state.

your ad here

Russian Foreign Minister Rejects US Proposal to Resume Nuclear Talks

moscow — Russia’s top diplomat on Thursday dismissed a U.S. proposal to resume a dialogue on nuclear arms control, saying it’s impossible while Washington offers military support to Ukraine. 

Speaking at his annual news conference, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the West of fueling global security risks by encouraging Ukraine to ramp up strikes on Russian territory and warned that Moscow would achieve its goals in the conflict despite Western assistance for Kyiv. 

Commenting on a U.S. proposal to resume contacts in the sphere of nuclear arms control, Lavrov described it as “unacceptable,” saying that Moscow had put forward its stance in a diplomatic letter last month. He argued that for such talks to be held, Washington first needed to revise its current policy toward Russia. 

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said in June that the Biden administration was ready to talk to Russia without conditions about nuclear arms control even as Russia-U.S. ties were at their lowest point since the Cold War, noting “it is in neither of our countries’ interest to embark on opening the competition in the strategic nuclear forces.” 

But Lavrov charged that Washington’s push for the revival of nuclear talks has been driven by a desire to resume inspections of Russia’s nuclear weapons sites. He described such U.S. demands as “indecent” and cynical in view of Ukraine’s attacks on Russian nuclear-capable bomber bases during the conflict. 

He mocked the U.S. offer to resume nuclear arms dialogue, arguing that Washington’s position amounts to saying, “We have declared you an enemy, but we’re ready to talk about how we could look at your strategic nuclear arsenal again.” 

Extensive mutual inspections of nuclear weapons sites were envisaged by the New START treaty, which then-Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev signed in 2010. The inspections were halted in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and never resumed. 

Moscow participation suspended

In February 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin suspended Moscow’s participation in the treaty, saying Russia could not allow U.S. inspections of its nuclear sites at a time when Washington and its NATO allies have openly declared Moscow’s defeat in Ukraine as their goal. Moscow emphasized, however, that it wasn’t withdrawing from the pact altogether and would continue to respect the caps on nuclear weapons the treaty set. 

The New START, the last remaining nuclear arms control pact between Russia and the United States, limits each country to no more than 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 700 deployed missiles and bombers. It’s set to expire in 2026, and the lack of dialogue on anchoring a successor deal has worried arms control advocates. 

“Amid a ‘hybrid war’ waged by Washington against Russia, we aren’t seeing any basis, not only for any additional joint measures in the sphere of arms control and reduction of strategic risks, but for any discussion of strategic stability issues with the U.S.,” he said. “We firmly link such possibility to the West fully renouncing its malicious course aimed at undermining Russia’s security and interests.” 

The minister said Washington’s push for restarting nuclear arms talks was rooted in a desire to “try to establish control over our nuclear arsenal and minimize nuclear risks for itself,” but added that “those risks are emerging as a result of forceful pressure on our country.” 

He accused the West of blocking any talks on ending the conflict and inciting the ramping up of attacks on Russia. 

“Such encouragement and the transfer of relevant weapons shows that the West doesn’t want any constructive solution,” Lavrov said. “The West is pushing toward the escalation of the Ukrainian crisis, and that raises new strategic risks.” 

Asked if tensions with the West over Ukraine could spiral into a showdown resembling the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis — when the U.S. and the Soviet Union found themselves on the edge of nuclear war — Lavrov sternly warned against encouraging Ukraine to strike targets in Russia. 

He specifically accused Britain of inciting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to order such attacks, although he didn’t offer any proof to back the claim. 

“London is literally egging on Zelenskyy to bomb any facilities anywhere in Russia,” Lavrov said. 

‘We will achieve’ goals in Ukraine

He reaffirmed that Russia would pursue what it calls the “special military operation” regardless of Western pressure. 

“We will consistently and persistently press the goals of the special military operation and we will achieve them,” he said. “They should have no hope that Russia could be defeated in any way. Those in the West who fantasize about it have failed to learn history lessons.” 

On other foreign policy issues, Lavrov talked at length about growing influence of the Global South and argued that Western sway in international affairs was waning. 

He hailed Russia-China ties, saying they were going through their “best period in history” and were stronger than a conventional military union. 

Lavrov reaffirmed Moscow’s call for the creation of an independent Palestinian state, describing it as the only way to ensure security for both Palestinians and Israel. He also criticized the U.S.-led attacks on Yemen, saying that “the more the Americans and the British bomb, the less desire to talk the Houthis have.”

your ad here

Pakistan, Iran Hint at De-escalation as Cross-border Strikes Raise Tensions

Tensions have been high between neighbors Pakistan and Iran since each conducted airstrikes on the other’s territory this week in pursuit of militants. Analysts say statements show both sides want to de-escalate. VOA’s Pakistan bureau chief Sarah Zaman reports. VOA footage by Wajid Asad.

your ad here

Blinken Heading to Africa Next Week on Four-Nation Tour

State Department — U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken will travel to Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, and Angola next week, the State Department announced, his fourth trip to the African continent.

The trip comes after 17 Cabinet-level official visits last year as a follow-up to the 2022 U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington.

President Joe Biden has also expressed his desire to visit Africa this year, but no definite plans have been announced.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said Blinken’s six-day trip will highlight how the United States has accelerated the U.S.-Africa partnership since the summit, including in areas such as climate, food and health security.

“He will also emphasize our future-focused economic partnership and how the United States is investing in infrastructure in Africa to boost two-way trade, create jobs at home and on the continent, and help Africa compete in the global marketplace,” Miller said.

Asked if countering China’s influence on the continent would be a major theme, Molly Phee, assistant secretary of state for African affairs, said this is more of a preoccupation of the media.

“If China didn’t exist, we would be fully engaged in Africa,” she said. “Africa is important for its own sake, and it’s important for American interests.”

Phee mentioned major U.S. infrastructure projects partnering with Angola and Cape Verde. She said a lot of the news coming out of Africa is negative, and Blinken’s trip would highlight the positive.

“I think it can highlight the great capacity of African people, particularly the youth. It can show really forward-looking types of engagements, for example, our partnership with Angola in outer space,” she said.

Phee said the Africa Cup of Nations football [soccer] tournament will be going on, and Blinken hopes to be able to attend a match in person while in the Ivory Coast.

Phee acknowledged that it is never possible for U.S. officials to get away from security issues, saying that Blinken would talk about the situation in the Sahel and coastal West Africa when he visits the Ivory Coast.

She said Nigeria is dealing with several internal security challenges, and Angola has played an important role in trying to address and reduce tensions in the eastern Congo.

In response to a question from VOA about Blinken’s visit to Cape Verde, Phee said the country is literally the port on Africa’s doorstep.

“It is also a terrific democracy. It’s a good model for the region,” she said.

your ad here

Chinese Tourism to South Africa Up, But Visas a Barrier

Johannesburg, South Africa — With its rolling winelands, picturesque coasts and iconic wildlife, South Africa is a prime destination for international tourists, but industry experts say the government needs to work on attracting more visitors from one massive market: China.  

Arrivals from China were up in the first 11 months of 2023 thanks to the Asian giant’s reopening and new direct flight routes, said Thandiwe Mathibela, a spokeswoman for South African Tourism, the tourism marketing arm of the South African government.  

“China saw a massive 215.7% surge, amounting to 34,669 arrivals. The reopening of the Chinese market and the initiation of direct flight routes have catalyzed a resurgence in arrivals, highlighting the vast potential and significance of this market to South African tourism,” she told VOA. 

But Chinese visitors to South Africa still make up a very small share of overall foreign arrivals. From January of last year until November, around 8 million tourists traveled to South Africa, according to government figures. Tourists from the United States, United Kingdom and Germany accounted for the most visitors. 

“Led by our minister of tourism, we continue to seek ways to make South Africa even more accessible to the Chinese visitors who want to come visit South Africa to experience our rich culture and heritage,” Mathibela said. 

Industry experts as well as the government acknowledge that South Africa’s visa system remains a major hindrance. Chinese who want to visit the country have to apply for a visa in advance and critics say the process is time-consuming and opaque. 

“Our current visa system is not warm, welcoming or easy to navigate in attracting Chinese tourists,” Rosemary Anderson, chairperson of the national trade association for the hospitality industry, FEDHASA, told VOA. 

“South Africa must streamline its visa process to fully capitalize on the vast potential of the Chinese tourism market. The nuances of this key market, such as a penchant for guided group travel, necessitate extensive support throughout the trip,” she said. 

Solutions could include either a visa exemption for Chinese nationals, or introducing a visa-on-arrival system, she said.  

“South Africa is popular with the Chinese market due to its rich cultural and natural assets. … Streamlining the visa process is critical to retain Chinese travel to South Africa and prevent further loss to competitor countries,” Anderson noted. 

Kenya, Zimbabwe and many other African countries that also offer attractions like wildlife safaris are either visa-free or offer visa-on-arrival for Chinese visitors.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa stressed the importance of the tourism sector ahead of last year’s summit in Johannesburg of the BRICS group of emerging nations, which includes both China and South Africa, and a state visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping. 

“South African Tourism expects that inbound Chinese tourism will recover to pre-COVID levels by 2026. We will be actively promoting our country as a tourism destination for Chinese tourists. … It is encouraging that direct flights between South Africa and China are increasing,” he said. 

Currently there are only direct flights between Johannesburg and China’s capital of Beijing or manufacturing hub Shenzhen, operated by Air China, but South African Airways is reportedly working on restarting flights too. 

In November, Tourism Minister Patricia De Lille told Bloomberg she would like to see visa requirements for Chinese short-term visitors waived or eased. 

Late last year, South African government officials traveled to China where they held events to promote South Africa as a tourist destination.

“South Africa supports the increase in the frequency of direct flights between South Africa and China to bring convenient services to more Chinese travelers. We have prioritized the facilitation of Mandarin language training through the Chinese Culture International Exchange Centre,” De Lille said at an event in Beijing. 

The Chinese side is also pushing for South Africa to make the visa process easier. 

“We look forward to the South African side making visa facilitation arrangements for Chinese nationals,” said Ambassador Chen Xiaodong last month. “That will attract more Chinese tourists and businesspeople to visit the Rainbow Nation and therefore boost our people-to-people exchanges and practical cooperation.” 

He noted that China is the world’s largest source country for outbound tourism and that before the pandemic, Chinese people would make about 150 million outbound trips a year.

Rachel Wang, manager of Asian Sun, a tour operator in South Africa that caters to the Asian market, was skeptical about promises to fix the visa system, telling VOA there has long been talk of South Africa doing so but so far nothing has happened. 

As well as visas, the economic slowdown in China is a barrier to more Chinese coming to South Africa, Wang said. “They’re going to cheaper destinations,” closer to home.   

your ad here

Turkey Joins Mine-Clearing Deal But Resists NATO Calls for Warships in Black Sea

Turkey has joined with Bulgaria and Romania to clear mines from the Black Sea, facilitating Ukrainian efforts to export grain to world markets. But as Dorian Jones reports from Istanbul, Turkey is also resisting calls to allow NATO mine-clearing ships.

your ad here

Ukrainian Volunteers Turn Old SUVs Into Lifesaving Vehicles

The need to move wounded soldiers from remote front lines to safety with limited resources has forced Ukrainian volunteers to innovate a way to turn used SUVs into casualty evacuation vehicles, or CASEVACS for short. Lesia Bakalets visited a workshop in Kyiv where old cars are repurposed into lifesaving vehicles. VOA footage by Evgenii Shynkar.

your ad here

Zambia Grapples With Child Marriages as Some Girls Defy the Practice

According to the U.N., about 1.7 million Zambian girls under the age of 18 are married, and more than 400,000 were 15 or younger when they got married. Kathy Short in Lusaka reports on efforts to end child marriage. Camera and video editing by Elias Chulu.

your ad here

Israel Ranks Among World’s Worst Jailers of Journalists, Report Finds

Washington — Israel’s ongoing response to last year’s Hamas attack has included a spike in arrests of Palestinian journalists in the occupied West Bank, a report released Thursday found.

The country in 2023 ranked as the sixth-worst jailer of journalists globally, with 17 behind bars, all of them jailed after the October 7 terror attack, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, or CPJ.

The annual report, which captures a snapshot of journalists jailed for their work as of December 1, found 320 journalists behind bars overall. Among those held are contributors to VOA and its sister networks Radio Free Asia and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

China topped the 2023 census, followed closely by Myanmar, Belarus, Russia and Vietnam. Iran tied with Israel for sixth place, each with 17 journalists jailed.

“The message is clear. Journalists hold the powerful to account,” said CPJ’s CEO Jodie Ginsberg. “And those in power often find that incredibly threatening.”

Ginsberg said the data shows how authoritarian regimes abuse laws to “detain and silence journalists.”

“And that’s exactly what it’s intended to do. It’s intended to silence critical voices,” she said.

CPJ has documented more arrests of Palestinian journalists since conducting its December 1, 2023, census. In total, Israel detained 25 since October 7, and as of Wednesday, 19 remained behind bars, CPJ found.

“These high number of arrests are simply a reflection of the broader crackdown that we’re seeing on journalists,” Ginsberg said.

 

The conflict has already proved to be the deadliest on record for journalists, with at least 83 journalists killed, including 76 Palestinians, four Israelis and three Lebanese.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry did not reply to VOA’s email requesting comment. It has previously denied targeting journalists.

Media-related detentions are common in the West Bank, according to Palestinian political analyst Nour Odeh. But Odeh, a former Al Jazeera reporter, said she has never witnessed anything like the recent wave of arrests.

“The scale is really astounding,” Odeh told VOA from Ramallah, adding that she thinks the goal behind the crackdown is “showing who’s boss.”

Most of those detained are held in administrative detention, CPJ found. That means Israeli authorities can hold the journalist without charge, on the grounds that they believe the journalist is planning to commit a crime in the future, CPJ said.

“You don’t really have to do anything to get arrested. There is no protection,” Odeh said. “There’s nothing that will shield you.”

Another trend in this year’s prison census is the use of non-journalism charges to target reporters, Ginsberg said. Those charges range from money laundering to tax evasion to terrorism.

“In that way, those in power can paint journalists as criminals, as the enemy,” Ginsberg said.

The Chinese government is among the countries that regularly use national security charges to target reporters.

China has long ranked among the world’s worst jailers of journalists, and this year the country ranked in the top spot, with 44 journalists imprisoned.

Nearly half of those — 19 — are Uyghurs, marking a grim intersection between Beijing’s poor press freedom record and its human rights abuses against the majority-Muslim ethnic group.

The United Nations has warned that China’s abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang may amount to crimes against humanity. Several governments, including the United States, have said the abuses amount to genocide. Beijing denies any wrongdoing.

For Zubayra Shamseden, who works at the Uyghur Human Rights Project in Washington, the disproportionate jailing of Uyghur reporters is no coincidence.

“For the Chinese government, Uyghur journalists are a dangerous group of people,” Shamseden told VOA. “They try to crack down on Uyghur journalists particularly because they want to shut the Uyghur voice off.”

CPJ’s Ginsberg said journalists who cover minority groups or are from minority groups themselves are among the most persecuted.

In response to VOA’s email requesting comment, a spokesperson at China’s Washington embassy rejected reports that Beijing does not respect media freedom.

“The Chinese government protects press freedom in accordance with law, and gives full play to the role of media and citizens in supervising public opinion,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said that some in the U.S. “smear and attack China,” which, they said, “in itself is spreading disinformation.”

Ginsberg pointed to Hong Kong — where media freedom has sharply declined since China enacted the National Security Law in 2020 — as just one piece of evidence to the contrary.

The pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai is currently on trial under the law and, if convicted, he could face life in prison.

Most journalists are jailed in their home countries. But of the 320 reporters held globally, CPJ documented 17 detained in foreign countries — most in Russia.

Of the 22 journalists imprisoned in Russia, 12 are foreign nationals, including two Americans and 10 Ukrainians. 

“That tells you not just how Russia wants to control the narrative inside the country, but also how it’s looking to control the narrative outside the country,” Ginsberg said.

Russia’s Washington embassy did not reply to VOA’s email requesting comment.

The Americans are The Wall Street Journal’s Evan Gershkovich and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Alsu Kurmasheva. International press freedom groups say the charges against both of them are groundless and politically motivated.

Gershkovich, who denies the espionage charges against him, has been detained for nearly 10 months. And Kurmasheva, who was detained in October, has rejected accusations she violated Russia’s foreign agent law.

Paul Beckett, a Washington-based assistant editor at the Journal who is leading the newspaper’s campaign to secure Gershkovich’s release, said the impending one-year anniversary of his colleague’s arrest should reinvigorate efforts to free the reporter.

“This should give everyone a renewed sense of urgency that this has gone on too long and needs to be remedied as quickly as possible,” Beckett told VOA.

your ad here

Pakistan Launches Retaliatory Strikes Against ‘Terrorist Hideouts’ in Iran

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan said Thursday that its military carried out strikes against “terrorist hideouts” in neighboring Iran two days after Tehran bombed what it said were “Iranian terrorists” sheltering on Pakistani soil.

The Pakistani foreign ministry said that its “highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision” military strikes killed a “number of terrorists” in Iran’s border province of Sistan-Baluchistan in what was codenamed as “death to terrorist.”

“Pakistan fully respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The sole objective of today’s act was in pursuit of Pakistan’s own security and national interest which is paramount and cannot be compromised,” the ministry said.

Iran’s state media quoted security officials as saying the Pakistani strikes killed at least seven “non-Iranian nationals” in the southeastern border city of Saravan. The dead reportedly included four children and three women.

The Pakistani retaliatory military action came after Iranian authorities said on Tuesday their “missiles and drone strikes” destroyed bases of an anti-Iran militant group, Jaish al-Adl, or the Army of Justice, in Pakistan’s border province of Baluchistan.

Islamabad condemned the strikes, saying it killed two children and several other civilians, vowing to respond accordingly.

Thursday’s military retaliation by Pakistan marked an unprecedented escalation in mutual tensions.

On Wednesday, Pakistan said it was recalling its ambassador from Tehran and suspending all bilateral engagements with Iran to protest the “unprovoked” deadly cross-border airstrike by Iranian security forces.

“Pakistan reserves the right to respond to this illegal act. The responsibility for the consequences will lie squarely with Iran,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch warned in a nationally televised statement.

She said that Islamabad had conveyed to the government in Tehran that the strikes were a “blatant breach” of Pakistan’s sovereignty and a violation of international law.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian, while speaking Wednesday on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, defended the overnight strike.

“None of the nationals of the friendly and brotherly country of Pakistan were targeted by Iranian missiles and drones,” he claimed. They hit “Iranian terrorists on the soil of Pakistan,” Amirabdollahian added.

The cross-border attack followed Iranian strikes on targets in Iraq and Syria linked to what Tehran called “anti-Iranian terrorist groups.”

The United States condemned the Iranian attacks.

“We’ve seen Iran violate the sovereign borders of three of its neighbors in just the past couple of days,” U.S. State Department spokesperson Mathew Miller told reporters in Washington. “I think it is a little rich for – on one the hand, Iran to be the leading funder of terrorism in the region, the leading funder of instability in the region; and on the other hand, claims that it needs to take these actions to counter-terrorism.”

The attack against suspected terrorist targets in Pakistan came hours after Pakistani caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar met with Amirabdollahian on the sidelines of the forum in Davos.

Iran’s strikes also occurred as Iranian and Pakistani navies were conducting a joint naval training exercise Tuesday in the Strait of Hormuz and the northern tip of the Persian Gulf to enhance cooperation and forge stronger relations, according to officials in both countries.

Pakistani opposition and hard-line groups criticized what they called a muted response by Islamabad to the aggression by Tehran, demanding a military response. Others, such as veteran Senator Mushahid Hussain, stressed the need for nuclear-armed Pakistan to show restraint.

“Pakistan’s response is both mature and measured, which is what the situation demands,” said Hussain, who heads the defense affairs committee of the upper house of parliament. “However, the Iranian government must rein in its trigger-happy ‘Deep State,’ the Revolutionary Guards, whose actions are destabilizing the region and damaging Pakistan-Iran relations,” he said.

China urged both countries Wednesday to exercise restraint and stressed that all countries’ sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity should be respected.

“Iran and Pakistan are close neighbors and major Islamic countries. We call on the two sides to exercise restraint, avoid actions that escalate the tension, and jointly keep the region peaceful and stable,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told a news conference in Beijing.

“With Pakistan now having retaliated militarily against Iran, now is the time for third-party mediation to ensure that a sudden but increasingly dangerous crisis doesn’t spiral out of control,” said Michael Kugelman, the director of the South Asia Institute at Wilson Center in Washington. “Beijing is the most logical intermediary, and it has (the) capacity and leverage to succeed,” Kugelman wrote on X.

Iran and Pakistan share a roughly 900-kilometer-long border, separating Iran’s turbulent southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province and Pakistan’s insurgency-hit Baluchistan.

Islamabad and Tehran routinely accuse each other of not doing enough to prevent anti-state armed groups from sheltering on their respective territories and plotting cross-border terrorist attacks against security forces on both sides.

Iran has long pressed Pakistan to crack down on alleged Jaish al-Adl bases in Baluchistan. The militant group from the Iranian Sunni Muslim minority claims to be fighting for greater rights for the community in the predominately Shiite Muslim country.

Last month, Jaish al-Adl claimed responsibility for killing around a dozen Iranian police officers in a raid near the Pakistani border, prompting Tehran to demand Islamabad move against the group’s hideouts.

The Iranian foreign minister said Wednesday that the previous day’s attack inside Pakistan was a response to the December raid by Jaish al-Adl on the police forces in the Iranian city of Rask in Sistan-Baluchistan.

Amirabdollahian said Iran respected the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Pakistan but would not “allow the country’s national security to be compromised or played with.”

For its part, Islamabad alleges that anti-Pakistan ethnic Baluch insurgent groups have established bases on the Iranian side of the border and from there direct deadly attacks on Pakistani security forces as well as civilians in impoverished, natural resources-rich Baluchistan. 

your ad here

Heavy Snowfall, Freezing Rain Disrupt Transport in Scandinavia, Germany 

berlin — Heavy snow and freezing rain hit parts of northern and central Europe on Wednesday, bringing transport to a halt in some Scandinavian regions and causing major disruption at airports in Frankfurt and Oslo. 

At Frankfurt Airport, Germany’s busiest, freezing rain forced a halt to takeoffs, German news agency dpa reported. The airport cited a danger of deiced aircraft icing up again as they taxied toward the runway. Some departures resumed in the afternoon as the rain subsided. Hundreds of flights already had been canceled. 

The airport in the Norwegian capital, Oslo, was closed temporarily as heavy snow reduced visibility for pilots. Airport spokesperson Ylva Celius Trulsen said the huge amount of snow and wind hampering traffic was “very unusual” and the resulting closure was “extremely rare.” The airport reopened later Wednesday. 

Heavy snowfall brought traffic to a standstill in large parts of Scandinavia, with roads and highways clogged with stranded motorists, public transportation delays, cancellations on some ferry routes and the closure of some bridges. Police in several parts of Denmark urged people to stay home. Southern Sweden also saw heavy snowfall. 

The freezing rain across western and southern Germany led to many accidents on icy roads early Wednesday. As a precaution, many schools and kindergartens closed and some companies offered employees the option of working from home. 

National train operator Deutsche Bahn canceled several long-distance trains and announced that the maximum speed of its ICE high-speed trains was limited to 200 kilometers per hour (124 mph) for the day as a precaution. 

The small airport in Saarbruecken closed for the day, and there were delays and cancellations in Munich and elsewhere. 

your ad here